On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 11:29:07AM -0800, John Erickson wrote:

| We've has a couple of club members lose planes recently from
| interference.

Personally, I've seen interference blamed for a lot of user errors
too.  Not that this is the case in your situation, but ...

| We have a scanner on the field.  It shows a channel is on
| (sporadically) although all our pins/radios are accounted for.  We
| suspect another flyer about a mile away but we've yet to find him.
| There are both houses and an industrial complex nearby.  I know they
| do some robotics in the industrial area.

You haven't said otherwise, so I'll assume you're in the US.  Your
address suggests so ...

What sort of scanner exactly is it?  Does it let you listen to the
signal?  Our R/C transmitters have a rather distinctive sound and it
should stick out very quickly.  (Of course, it's also possible that
the signal isn't FM.  Could be AM, or some digital mode that would
sound best with a SSB receiver.)

Here in Austin, TX, there's strong pager signals (yes, people DO still
use pagers!) on a few frequencies in between our R/C channels.
They're intermittent and last only a second or two, but they're either
strong enough or transmitted from enough towers to be picked up all
over town.  Being only 10 kHz from our channels, they could easily
overwhelm a receiver and send the plane out of control if it can't
reject glitches.

You'll also find wireless microphones and pagers of the sorts used by
restraunts in the 72 mHz band.  And I've heard that railroads and
industrial uses can be assigned frequencies in the 72 mHz band for R/C
use as well.

Pagers also have rather distinctive sounds.
http://www.kb9ukd.com/digital/ gives a number of digital data
transmission modes (and sample .wav files) amd you might be able to
identify something by listening to it.  You might even be able to
decode it with the right software :)

[ Mental note: I need to send this guy some sound bites of R/C
  transmitters. ]

If your scanner/receiver gives you a signal strength meter, you could
make a 72 mHz yagi antenna and use that to determine what direction
the rogue signal is coming from, if it lasts long enough.  Of course,
such an antenna will be quite large -- roughly 2 meters by 2 meters.

And even if you find the source of the signal, there's likely to not
be much you can do about it.  If it has a fixed frequency, you could
stop using the frequencies near that.  If it's a guy with a park
flier, you could ask him to fly somewhere else, or work out some
frequency sharing arrangement with you, but ultimately he has just as
much right to the frequency as you do, even if you're flying at an AMA
club and he's not.

And yes, the ultimate solution to most of our frequency control issues
will be some sort of spread spectrum setup.  Alas, while this is
completely feasable and practical technically (and even cheap!),
politically there's still a number of issues to be overcome before it
can become reality.

People *do* already sell spread spectrum R/C equipment -- it's out
there now.  But it's on the 900 mHz and 2400 mHz bands, and the power
allowed is very low, so there's lots of interference of all sorts, and
so the range will be relatively poor.  And the AMA regulations don't
permit it's use yet, so that means that AMA members can't really use
it, at least not and still follow the AMA rules that you've agreed to
follow.

Here's some --

   http://www.auav.net/spread_spectrum_radio.htm
   http://www.ajhobby.com/product.asp?pid=2420

Not that you should buy it, but it is out there.

| Would it be possible to start your flight with reduced range (3/4 signal
| strength) and then flip to full strength in an emergency?

3/4 signal strength would be almost identical to full strength.

Even 1/10 strength will get pretty far -- which is why rubber duckies
and similar antennas work well in most cases.

If you really wanted multiple power modes, I'd suggest a 1/1000 th
power mode for doing simple adjustments to your plane without
interfering with others (but even then there's the possibility, so
it's not such a great idea) and full power.  But the danger is that
somebody would accidently take off in low power mode ...

| Better yet, a way to boost signal strength?

Sure, you could make a 20 watt transmitter.  It would be illegal in
most of the world, and would cause problems for your fellow fliers, as
well as getting really hot in your hands, but it could be done.  I
wouldn't suggest it.

What can you do that's reasonable and legal?  Keep using your scanner.
If the interference is always in the same place, stop using those
channels near it.  If possible, find out where the signal is coming
from and talk to the people in charge of it -- maybe you can work
something out, maybe not.  (And remember, you probably can't force
somebody to do anything.  And if you try, you could make them angry
enough to deliberately shoot down your planes.)

Have people use receivers that reject glitches -- either PCM, or the
new `smart' PPM receivers that have become popular.  These aren't a
magic bullet, but at least when the interference hits your plane's
controls won't go to random positions, but instead will stay right
where they were or maybe eventually go to a failsafe location.

-- 
Doug McLaren, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Failure is not an option.  It comes bundled with your Microsoft products.
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format

Reply via email to