Hi Martin do you know the answer to this question?
I need to avoid making a mistake in PR communications. thanks Sean On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Sean DALY <[email protected]> wrote: > Put another way: what is the response to Gerald's question, Does Sugar > on a Stick run on the XO-1? > > If the response is: > > it won't, and is not planned, or > it will, but no date yet, or > it could, but not enough resources to plan work & set a date, > > any of those responses are cool, but I need to know what the best > response is to the question. > > As a function of the response, I will call it out (or not) in the PR > or blog posts. > > I had the beta soas04xo (Blueberry) running & crashing on the XO-1, > but the beta 05 has blocked the machine in question. > > Facilitating teacher tests of more recent Sugar on installed-base XO-1 > machines is a goal worth the effort. > > You are probably aware that some pundits (justly or unjustly) consider > Sugar Labs to have turned our backs on the existing deployments... > > Sean > > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Peter Robinson <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Sean DALY <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Sebastian, can you remind me please, will there be a version of SoaS >>> Blueberry for the XO-1 on Tuesday? or later? >>> >>> I need to know for the PR, we will be mentioning how the XO-1.5 will >>> have a newer version of Sugar, that Blueberry has the latest stable >>> version of Sugar, etc. >> >> Is there a version of SoaS 2 for the XO-1.5? If not I don't see why >> you would want to mention it as it would only create confusion. AFAICT >> the version of sugar shipping on the XO-1.5 is 0.84 based on Fedora 11 >> so not really related at all to the release in question. >> >> Peter >> > _______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
