Thanks everybody for the proposals thus far. I've converted them into a table for a better overview [1]. Please keep in mind that Sugar has a defined color palette for its logo, too [2].
--Sebastian [1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick_meetings#Agenda [2] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Marketing_Team/Logo#Color_Palette On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Outofindia <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jambul > also known as Jamun in India and by others name in different parts of the > world. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jambul > > A medicinal fruit/plant/tree. > Supposed to be a rich source of iron, vitamins A and C > Besides the fruit, every part of the tree too is used. > The bark, the seed (dried and powdered) and even ash from the burnt leaves > for gums. > The wood is used to make furniture! > > The colour crimson. > > http://www.agriculturalproductsindia.com/fruits/fruits-jamun.html > > Regards > > Harriet > > > > On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Sebastian Dziallas <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hi Sean, >> >> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Sean DALY <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Sebastian, I guess you want to drop the name we had chosen together >> > previously, Cloudberry? If you remember we had wanted to underline >> > collaboration and connectivity, and decided to postpone that name when >> > we realized that it was too ambitious for this release. >> >> this is by no means the intention of this email. You will note that >> this email is also sent to the marketing list, so this is not aimed at >> excluded marketing, but rather at getting the conversation started. >> >> We're simply encouraging brainstorming here so that we don't get stuck >> later there and have a prominent way of calling the upcoming next >> version early in the release cycle (Fedora has already chosen its >> codename for F14, too). >> >> I don't recall us already having chosen Cloudberry. It was the >> previous codename for v.3, but as you say, we decided to go with >> Mirabelle instead since it could have caused confusion. >> >> I personally believe that it only makes sense to chose a name like >> Cloudberry if we're able to provide a sufficient amount of >> cloud-related features, since we might get otherwise beaten up over >> it. >> >> > This is a marketing discussion and should really be in the marketing >> > meeting. Sugar on a Stick is a pillar of our marketing strategy and >> > the name needs to fit with our strategy. That said, I wouldn't want to >> > spoil anyone's fun choosing ice cream flavors. It could be nice to >> > pick a non-berry flavor too as Peter and others have said in the past. >> >> I think this is debatable and I'm certainly not objecting to having >> this conversation in the marketing meeting, too. However, this also >> concerns the project itself, so I think it's also fair to raise it in >> the Sugar on a Stick meeting. >> >> --Sebastian >> >> > Sean >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Sebastian Dziallas <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> We'd like to kick off the process for the upcoming Sugar on a Stick >> >> v.4 already, while gearing up for the SoaS PR at LinuxTag, too. And so >> >> we're looking forward to your ideas and suggestions on the codename >> >> and colour selections for the next release iteration. These will be >> >> discussed at the next meeting, which is scheduled to take place on >> >> Monday, June 7 on 1900 UTC in #sugar-meeting. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> --Sebastian >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Marketing mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing >> >> >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) >> [email protected] >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep _______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
