On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Raffael Reichelt <[email protected]> wrote: > 2010/6/21 James Cameron <[email protected]>: >> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 08:12:08AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Raffael Reichelt >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > I understood, we are now an official Fedora-Spin, but should our >>> > bootscreen not be at least sugarized? I think I remember strawberry >>> > booted with a nice sugarlabs logo. >>> >>> It is sugarized. For the SoaS boot we have a boot screen not >>> dissimilar to the OLPC one. The difference is that we display a sugar >>> logo at the beginning. >> >> Current OLPC builds display a "Sugarlabs" and a "Fedora remix" logo. >> >> -- >> James Cameron >> http://quozl.linux.org.au/ >> _______________________________________________ >> SoaS mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas >> > > I exactely followed Sebastians instructions for building an image from > fedora hosted git - there is only a fedora-pre-boot screen (automatic > Boot in 10 seconds) followed by a fedora14 progress bar on a black > screen.
It sounds like what Raffael is talking about is the screen before the plymouth boot screen comes up. It is indeed true that this syslinux screen is currently Fedora branded. Should we evaluate modifying that (I'm thinking of the sugar-logos package) and probably put that through the feature process? Is there anybody who'd be interested in taking this? --Sebastian > I just tried booting with hardware in my office - it is the same. > > What did I do wrong now? are there specific requirements to > video/display to show it? > > Raffael > _______________________________________________ > SoaS mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas _______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
