On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Peter Robinson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> On 28.05.2012, at 15:52, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> SoaS still has the old Etoys version (4.1). Etoys 5 was released along >>>> with Sugar 0.96. It is more robust wrt presence service failures. >>> >>> it also still needs the sugar-presence-service package which has been >>> obsolete for a long >>> time. >> >> >> Etoys 5 is no worse than previous versions in that respect. On the contrary, >> it deals better with presence service deterioration. >> >> Re-implementing the presence service takes time, I'm on my own, can't make >> it happen soon. > > I think it's been over 2 years, I might just drop eToys from the build > because it always causes random issues.
Peter, I urge you to not drop Etoys. It is one of the most powerful learning tools we offer. Sugar is greatly diminished without it. Are there open tickets on these random issues? regards. -walter > > Peter > _______________________________________________ > SoaS mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org _______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
