On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm trying to get a little bit more organised for this cycle than I > have been over the last couple. > > The plans for SoaS v9 are going to be somewhat simple. We're going to > stick with the 0.98.x release of Sugar and focusing on polish. > > I would like to see more people testing and using it during the dev > cycle so I don't get the "My Activity is broken" post release or five > minutes before release when we're generating final images and pushing > them out to the Fedora mirrors. > > I would also like to remove sugar-presence-service but that would mean > either dropping eToys or the developers stepping up to actually fix > the dependency that they've only been promising to do for 2 or so > years. > > Is there anything in particular that people would like to contribute > during this cycle? Anything I can help someone achieve? Does anyone > want to dig into the documentation on the web site to improve the > process? > > I'd also love marketing to get involved since we've not had any > publicity for a number of releases and after all Walter was telling me > some time back that it's the biggest single driver in the wiki. > > Finally there's a Test Compose for the alpha available in the > following link. I've used it briefly in a VM and it boots and seems to > mostly work. > > http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/19-Alpha-TC1/Live/
I forget to mention for this cycle we'll also produce SoaS images to run on a number of ARM platforms. The first test of these should arrive around F-19 Beta. Peter _______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list SoaS@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas