Note that irc works in Soas but is not installed. Dnf install in sugar terminal works, then call it in terminal.
> On May 12, 2020, at 10:14 AM, Alex Perez <ape...@alexperez.com> wrote: > > > FYI. See below e-mail. There may be others in the list that I'm unaware of. > Ibiam, we should probably get you set up as a maintainer > for the sugar packages listed below: > > Here's a curated list of packages that are/may be relevant to us/SoaS: > > rpms/sugar-analyze is retired but does not list 'orphan' in its users > rpms/sugar-analyze is retired and has the following: 'maintainers': > pbrobinson, tuxbrewr, callkalpa > rpms/sugar-help is retired but does not list 'orphan' in its users > rpms/sugar-help is retired and has the following: 'maintainers': pbrobinson, > callkalpa > rpms/sugar-presence-service is retired and has the following: 'maintainers': > pbrobinson, tomeu > rpms/webkitgtk is retired but does not list 'orphan' in its users > rpms/webkitgtk is retired and has the following: 'maintainers': pwalter, > kevin, tpopela, huzaifas, mso > rpms/webkitgtk3 is retired but does not list 'orphan' in its users > rpms/webkitgtk3 is retired and has the following: 'maintainers': phatina, > mclasen, pwalter, tpopela 'groups': @gnome-sig > rpms/webkitgtk4 is retired but does not list 'orphan' in its users > rpms/webkitgtk4 is retired and has the following: 'maintainers': tpopela, > kalev, catanzaro 'groups': @gnome-sig > > > >> From: Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> >> Date: May 11, 2020 at 11:49 PM >> To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Subject: Retired packages with maintainers >> Good Morning Everyone, >> >> A little while ago we have received the request on the infra issue tracker to >> remove all maintainers of retired packages [1]. >> >> So today I decided to look at what this would look like and wrote a script >> that >> queries PDC for the list of all branches on all projects [2], gather from it >> a >> list of all the packages that are retired on all their branches (so all >> branches >> are ``active=false``). >> For each of these retired project, it queries dist-git to find out if they >> still >> have maintainers in addition to the ``orphan`` user. >> >> The outcome of this script can be found there: >> >> https://pingou.fedorapeople.org/retired_packages_with_maintainers.log >> >> >> Some stats about this: >> - 881 RPM packages are retired and still have maintainers (out of 4322 >> retired >> RPMs). >> - 662 of them are not orphaned >> - 42 modules are retired and still have maintainers (out of 42 retired >> modules). >> - all of them are not orphaned >> - 2 containers are retired and still have maintainers (out of 3 retired >> containers). >> - all of them are not orphaned >> >> Which brings a couple of questions: >> - Do we have a documented way to mark modules as orphaned or retired? >> - Should we orphan all the RPM packages that are retired but not orphaned? >> >> >> Finally, does everyone agree about the original request: "remove all >> maintainers >> of retired packages"? Or should we bring this to FESCo? >> >> >> Thanks for your inputs, >> >> Pierre >> >> >> [1] https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8600 >> [2] https://pdc.fedoraproject.org/extras/active_branches.json (8+Mb file) >> _______________________________________________ >> devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > _______________________________________________ > SoaS mailing list > SoaS@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
_______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list SoaS@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
