Hello, This week did not include coding. I mostly discussed[0] with my mentor about how to improve the project's code. I started working on the following ideas:
* Handle packages containing numbers in their name (may be we have two versions of one package inside the archive) A dependency might not be found into UDD cause the version in the package name is not updated. In this case it would make sense to replace this package with the package containing the latest version in its name. * Handle packages that are not found inside the archive but look "suspicious" for changed name. This will happen when a package is updated and its name changed but the package is not updated into the task files. A first approach handling such cases will be to look into the column "replaces" of packages UDD table. * update blend-gen-control in order to regard versioned dependencies Next week: Next week I will attend on the DebConf. In the spare time I will start coding the above mentioned ideas. Also from now on I will continue developing only one version of the scripts and specific the sec-blend-gen-control(and not both) and in cause I step on trouble I might fallback to the other version of the script(blend-gen-control). [0]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-blends/2013/08/msg00006.html , https://lists.debian.org/debian-blends/2013/08/msg00008.html , https://lists.debian.org/debian-blends/2013/08/msg00010.html
_______________________________________________ Soc-coordination mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/soc-coordination
