Hello everyone, This week:
We chose sec-blend-control script to be the main script of the new blends-dev. From now on the following cases are handled properly: A) Packages that are not found inside the archive but look "suspicious" for changed name (updated name/replaced by other package) B) Missing packages containing numbers in their name (a newer version of this package might be available) If sec-blend-gen-control finds packages matching the above cases(which are actually missing from the control file) it prints a warning message with the possibly available packages, for example for debian-edu blend: "mozilla-openoffice.org" has been replaced with "browser-plugin-libreoffice" or **Missing package sugar-emulator-0.88 has the following existing versions: sugar-emulator-0.96 Next week: * Update blend-gen-control in order to regard versioned dependenciess(a goal that I did not complete this week :-( ) I will discuss with my mentor how we should proceed from now on for the next weeks. For sure we will start testing blends-dev in action(create actual metapackages for blends) and implement any other idea that might improve the existing code. Kind regards Emmanouil
_______________________________________________ Soc-coordination mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/soc-coordination
