That really was beautiful... it's been moved to my "KeeperS" folder. Well done, Solomon.
Rafael --- Jim McMurry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Solomon you are a poet my friend ! > > jm > > > > On 6/24/05, S. Kevin Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > My first impression was that one of our members > had > > his box pwn3d or zombified into a spam relay, and > it > > was adding all his Outlook Contacts into its own > > comprehensive list of spam-to-be victims, which in > > turn, would add this list. > > > > In the meantime, yes, I should be looking for > someone > > who wants me to RIP off her TCP Wrappers and > fondle > > her TTLs while sniffing her packets. Maybe > something > > kinky, like my own chroot jail, where I'd > brute-force > > her buffer and bash the shell out of her. She'd > take > > a huge coredump on me while IP in her hair before > we'd > > wipe off with so many rolls of FTP that you > wouldn't > > be able to flush it. > > We would make compile for, like, four hours > straight, > > and after spoofing her headers with my SQL > injection, > > I might be left with nothing but an empty string. > > Hello World, I say. > > > > The traditional "unzip, strip, touch, finger, > grep, > > mount, fsck, more, yes, umount, sleep" has nothing > on > > this. Hope I wasn't too graphical. > > > > > > Solomon Chang > > > > --- Tom Emerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I'd imagine that since Frank moved the list > after > > > his server died, we're a > > > bit more "exposed" to things such as this. When > > > this list was on his > > > system, the only way you knew about it was > > > word-of-mouth or by visiting the > > > socalwug site itself. Now that it is a > > > "googlegroup", there is much higher > > > visibility -- anyone can do a > "drive-by-spamming" by > > > simply joining the list > > > [since the interface is now through google and > not > > > under Frank's direct > > > control] and firing off a message with > questionable > > > content. > > > > > > (actually, they could have done the same when > Frank > > > was in direct control as > > > he did not scrutinize each and every > subscription > > > request, but as I said, > > > "this list" simply didn't have enough visibility > to > > > be considered a viable > > > target until now...) > > > > > > Also, the spamassassin report my system added > > > indicated that the Yahoo part > > > may have been forged, so it is possible that > "kitty" > > > never actually > > > "subscribed", but rather faked enough of the > headers > > > to cause the google > > > mail/group server to think it was a legit > message. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of > > > jo3 > > > > Subject: [SOCALWUG] Re: Looking for sexy > adults > > > contacts? > > > > > > > > How did this happen? > > > > > > > > kitty wrote: > > > [something wholly inappropriate for this list -- > no > > > need to keep repeating > > > it] > > > > > > > > > > >
