Jim Thompson wrote: > this doesn't mean they're FCC compliant (even if it did happen). Y
What is not FCC compliant? > Which it probably didn't. It's heresay on your part as well as theirs. All I am showing you is that what they are telling you is legally possible under FCC part 97 rules. > You still have 35 dBi of antenna gain raising the side lobes. Under part 97 rules, spurious emssions are measured relative to the input power to the antenna of the fundamental emission. The antenna gain applies to both the main carrier and the spurs. 97.307(e) "For a transmitter having a mean power of 25 W or less, the mean power of any spurious emission supplied to the antenna transmission line must not exceed 25 uW and must be at least 40 dB below the mean power of the fundamental emission, but need not be reduced below the power of 10 uW." > http://www.wlanparts.com/product/XI-325HPPLUS says "up to > 24.7dBm" (292mW), and since these are Intersil/connexant Prism2- > based, you can't "tune the power" like you could with an atheros- > based card. The Prism 2.5 Chipset can be power controlled under Linux. I have done it on a Senao 2511, but not this Z-Com card. > > > On Aug 1, 2005, at 9:20 PM, Humphrey Cheung wrote: > > > > > I interviewed the team after the awards ceremony. > > > > They dialed down the 300 mw cards to 30 mw. > > > > Humphrey Cheung > > Editor > > > > www.tomshardware.com 73, Konrad
