-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tom Farrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I assume the content filter did not like the words 'for ****'
Well, I was wrong about that.
>> Warning message from administrator:
>> Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail.
Perhaps the administrator can tell me what he finds sensitive :| Discussion
of (Patriot-Act II like SMEX) secretly implemented policies? ;)
- ------- Start of forwarded message -------
X-Envelope-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: System Attendant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tom Farrow'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and action t
aken.
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 04:05:54 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain
Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content.
Place = [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ; ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender = Tom Farrow
Subject = [SOCALWUG] Policy changes should at least be posted if not
discussed
Delivery Time = February 27, 2003 (Thursday) 04:05:53
Policy = Spam phrases
Action on this mail = Delete message
Warning message from administrator:
Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail.
- ------- End of forwarded message -------
- --
Tom Farrow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/38F56384 04B6DBF6448BB3AECE99 BBEB1286954738F56384
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>
iD8DBQE+XhAYEoaVRzj1Y4QRAkJoAJ9DR4lJvaIkE+/a5o33O4Jww9irJgCeI9bp
87dqaLZI0fo9e3B2o4d0Hdg=
=t4Xs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
