I don't think it's going to work out the way you want it to, this way.  You can try 
it, but the connection between the 10.4.x.x network and the 10.1.1.1 interface is most 
likely going to fail as long as both are sub-netted at 255.255.0.0

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/07/03 04:44PM >>>


I have two interfaces. I just sent one of them. The other one is down now.
(Murphy rules.)

I have another question. My router is Cisco 2500 version 11.1(8). I think I
need a new firmware to be able to use NAT command. Instead of dealing with
the router,
can I do something like this?
10.4.x.x ==> 10.1.1.1 ==>static route to 10.1.1.111 (machine) ==> 10.1.1.130

The machine will have WinRoute software installed - it has one NIC. The
software will do the NAT for that specific IPs.

How does it sound?

Another quick question: Where can I learn about networking stuff? I feel
really dumb and sick of trial and error.

Thank you very much.
Cem


Reply via email to