http://online.wsj.com/article_email/0,,SB110627220789332234-INjfYNilaJ4nZ2pZ
IKIcKWHm4,00.html

After Michael Powell
January 21, 2005; Page A8

The bad news is that we are told that Michael Powell, one of Washington's
better bureaucrats, is calling it quits today after four years at the helm
of the Federal Communications Commission. You read it here first. The good
news is that his exit affords the Bush Administration an opportunity to
re-evaluate its stepchild treatment of telecom policy.

Given the media coverage, you might think Mr. Powell's tenure has been about
little more than Janet Jackson's wardrobe malfunctions and Howard Stern's
potty mouth. In fact, Mr. Powell has spent the past four years focused on
much more substantive matters regarding the government's role in overseeing
a telecommunications sector that has never been more dynamic.

This is Mr. Powell's proper legacy, and if he failed to reach all of his
goals, some of the blame rests with a White House that never fully grasped
telecom's potential to drive economic growth. Between 1989 and 2001, labor
productivity in telecom grew annually by an average of more than 3%, versus
a 1.6% pace in the overall nonfarm economy. Information technology alone was
responsible for nearly two-thirds of the rise in labor productivity in the
late 1990s.

After the tech bubble burst and mild recession, however, billions of capital
investment dollars retreated to the sidelines. Only during the final months
of the Presidential campaign did Mr. Bush begin making noises about clearing
away "the regulatory underbrush" that was holding back the venture
capitalists and faster broadband deployment, among other things.

Mr. Powell's deregulatory instincts led him to make broadband development
and deployment a priority. By declaring cable modem an "information service"
in 2002, the FCC was able to block efforts to apply the entire telephone
regulation boondoggle to new broadband technologies. Last November, the FCC
accomplished a similar goal with respect to VOIP, which enables consumers to
make phone calls over the Internet.

The White House ultimately abandoned Mr. Powell when he tried to update
media ownership rules in response to a federal court decision that found the
current regulations "arbitrary and capricious and contrary to law." The
Administration agreed with the Chairman in principle but went soft after
Democrats and liberal interest groups complained that revisions might allow
Rupert Murdoch to own a couple more TV stations.

Mr. Powell's battle royale, however, surrounded his efforts to address the
make-believe "competition" spawned by the 1996 Telecom Act, which forced the
Baby Bells to unbundle their local phone networks and lease them to rivals
at discount rates. The requirements, supported by AT&T and others that
subsequently built business models around this subsidy, have depressed
investment and limited consumer choice.

The FCC unbundling decision last month split the baby; it phases out some of
these rules by 2006 but not all of them, so more litigation is a
possibility. And the ruling itself came at least 18 months too late, thanks
in part to opposition from Mr. Powell's fellow Republican Commissioner Kevin
Martin.

This brings us to the matter of potential replacements for the Chairman at
the five-member agency, and whether President Bush will squander an
opportunity to start taking telecom more seriously. The White House decision
last month to renominate Democratic Commissioner and Tom Daschle-protege
Jonathan Adelstein was not a good start, to say the least, since he and
fellow Democratic Commissioner Michael Copps are reliable opponents of
genuine competition.

Mr. Martin is gunning for Chairmanship, but his decision in the unbundling
fight to put personal ambition above good policy split the Commission and
helped extend the telecom depression. The last thing Mr. Bush should want is
to repeat the mistake of putting Republicans in a de facto minority position
at the agency. The next Chairman not only needs Mr. Powell's instincts and
vision but also a Commission that will follow his lead.

Other names mentioned for the post include Becky Klein, a former head of the
Texas Public Utility Commission; Michael Gallagher of the National
Telecommunications and Information Administration; and Janice Obuchowski, a
telecom consultant who served in the Commerce Department under Mr. Bush's
father. Someone like former Interstate Commerce Commission Chairman Darius
Gaskins or former Federal Trade Commission Chairman Jim Miller also would be
an excellent choice to keep the FCC on a deregulatory path.

Mr. Powell spent four years as an FCC Commissioner before taking over the
agency in 2001. So it's easy to believe that after eight years he's ready
for some new challenges, probably in the private sector. We hope the
Administration hasn't taken him for granted and is up to the challenge of a
worthy replacement.



---------

Frank Keeney
Tel: +1-626-344-1424
Antennas, Cables and Equipment:
http://www.wlanparts.com

Reply via email to