Hi! Am 16.12.2015 um 12:08 schrieb Mikael Nordfeldth: > On 2015-12-16 08:18, Michael Vogel wrote: >> I'm working at the OStatus implementation of Friendica. > > Awesome!
The implementation was already existing in Friendica. I just reworked it completely by reverse engineering the communication. >> We are sending salmon notifications when we are commenting in a thread. >> Mostly they are accepted, but sometimes - especially with quitter.se - >> our notifications are answered with the HTTP error 400. > > quitter.se is running a very old version of GNU social. It has several > known bugs. Don't use it as a test platform. The implementation is already in production status and it is working fine with most servers. I just experienced problems with especially that server. The old version is a good explanation. >> Is there a difference if we mention a user with an SSL or an non-SSL >> link? Or is is normalized before the check? > > URIs with https:// and http:// are different. Sometimes people change > their URIs locally. This creates headache. Good to know. The upcoming Friendica version will mention every user in four different ways: * http://server.tld/user/(number) * https://server.tld/user/(number) * http://server.tld/(username) * https://server.tld/(username) I'm using it in that way: <link rel="mentioned" ostatus:object-type="http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/person"; href="https://server.tld/user/(number)"/> Hopefully this will solve all problems. Or do you think that this could generate additional problems? Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
