On 20 January 2018 at 13:20, marc <[email protected]> wrote: > quoting carlo freely, probably messily =) > > > Teddks was the man who convinced >> me that federation was a dead horse. Now we are dealing >> with dead elephants as an alternative to it. Progress! >> (...) >> How can anything that goes onto the blockchain scale up? >> > > Well, i don't know, that was why i was asking.. since are very visible > developed techs, > perhaps holochain, and that mike s miller approach bring something new > there. idk. >
No block chains typically cant scale up, at least not efficiently. This is why layer 2+ is useful. Or using the a distributed web strategy. Happy new year all! :) > > > > Eight years ago there was this "gnu social p2p" vs >> "gnu social" dispute. >> > > well, i hope to help re-open this enterprise project, why not at gnu? > makes sense to try. or let's try a bunch of us further something really > well based-done. > > i agree that blockchain has shadened the brighter p2p is, and this worries > me, as you see, i do phrasing mistakes with that. > > > Reinventing Bitmessage? >> > > i forgot to mention zeronet.io, that uses bitmessage, since it says it > also uses blockchain tech, would you dislike it as a code base, let's say > for a mory groupy fakebook-like project? > > > You would want all users to publish how long they have been >> watching some crp and prove it by some cryptographic means? >> Just when I thought we had enough surveillance economy. >> > > hey wait there :), i said "users who agree to donate their (even inner > interactivity) data". > i.e. i want to donate even my mouse clicking pretending.. > > why should i be denied to contribute this type of data to the most or some > other refined machines if i want to? > forced privacy is forcing, and despite for passwords or such security > things, > appeals to privacy have to be recomendations, or otherwise can be security > or integrity patronizing fallacies > > in this sense, as a PoC, i imagine a wysiwyg like editor that let's you > offuscate for robots some pieces of some text from some type of content > > btw. staying watching something for more than 5 seconds, could be a easy > way to moderate anything. > > > > > Has anyone told you blockchain people that basic income >> models over ethereum fail because the super-rich needed >> to finance it will simply not take part? >> > > this was coming from the proof-of-presence issue, but has gone into > another, very interesting, point, which my reply is: > > any community, including the states, can start a basic income > > we do not need the super-rich to help us in this, we can do it much much > easier than we think, but we are too lazy. it is easier to stay in our > confort areas (including complaining about the super rich only, which is > not your case carlo) > > > > Maybe it takes a certain lack of rationality to >> successfully become a fan of blockchains. >> > > "money" is out there as a virus we need to convive with that is testing > us... > > > > > ------- > > hack on! > > >
