Those all sound great. Thanks, Guillaume. Best, --Ed
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:55 PM, Michael Guss <[email protected]> wrote: > Much agreement with Guillaime's comments. Otherwise I'll tweak as > necessary. > > > On Wednesday, June 3, 2015, Guillaume Paumier <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I don't have a lot of feedback on the other proposals, but this one >> caught my eye: >> >> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Fabrice Florin <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > • Bruce Jenner has recently come out and changed his name to Caitlyn >> Jenner. The sudden news sparked activity on Caitlyn's Wikipedia page. See >> how editors responded and follow the story today. [link] >> >> The first sentence is problematic; it uses the wrong name, the wrong >> pronoun ("his") and reduces the male-to-female transition to a mere >> "name change". We must not post this. >> >> Regarding the other proposals, I would favor saying "Wikipedians" or >> "Wikipedia editors" instead of "Wikipedia" when saying "Wikipedia >> responded", to make it clear the people who responded are volunteer >> editors. It's more organic and human than "Wikipedia". >> >> Thank you for writing the story. >> >> -- >> Guillaume Paumier >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Social-media mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >> > > > -- > Michael Guss > Research Analyst > Wikimediafoundation.org > [email protected] > > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > >
_______________________________________________ Social-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
