+1, but I'd like to hear Katherine's thoughts first. --Ed
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Tilman Bayer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Joe, > > agree with you on both aspects - on the one hand it's more political > and opinionated (i.e. non-NPOV) that what @wikipedia would normally > feature, but on the other hand there has IMHO rarely been a political > issue with more directly impact on the work of Wikimedians. > > I would suggest to simply retweet the Times, from @wikipedia, > @wikimedia and @wikicommons: > > https://twitter.com/thetimes/status/613693063320485888 > > For more context, see > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Freedom_of_Panorama_2015 , > which includes some Twitter ideas already and the hashtags currently > in use, in particular https://twitter.com/hashtag/saveFoP?src=hash . > Some (not all) of these would also be suitable for RTs. > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Joe Sutherland > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > This might be good to get social out for, since it would directly affect > us. > > > > I'm not sure if it's the kind of thing we normally post since it's quite > political, so would be good to hear opinions! > > > > Joe > > > > > > > -- > Tilman Bayer > Senior Analyst > Wikimedia Foundation > IRC (Freenode): HaeB > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > -- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________ Social-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
