I proposed a good deal of these because I'd like to start socializing our articles more than once each (as discussed in our Monday meeting)—more so for the picks and news, but at least twice here.
On the Twitter suggestion, how about this? 80 hours finding sources, who knows how long reading them, and 300 hours writing: one person, one article. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/06/30/improving-wikipedia-texas-revolution/ --Ed On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:14 PM, James Alexander <[email protected]> wrote: > > > James Alexander > Community Advocacy > Wikimedia Foundation > (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Joe Sutherland <[email protected] > > wrote: >> >> >> >> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/06/30/improving-wikipedia-texas-revolution/ >> >> >> *Twitter (@wikimedia/@wikipedia):* >> >> • This #Wikipedia editor devoted hundreds of hours to one article. >> • Two women are taking the lead on improving #Wikipedia's articles on the >> #Texas Revolution. Here's one of them. >> • Ever wonder why #Wikipedia's articles on the #Texas Revolution are so >> good? >> • 80 hours identifying sources, who knows how long reading them, and 300 >> hours of writing. And that's just one person. >> >> > I love the last one but would love to incorporate the 1 article piece too > I think that resonates. How about: > > > - 80 hours finding sources, who knows how long reading them, and 300 > hours writing. And that's just 1 person 1 article > https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/06/30/improving-wikipedia-texas-revolution/ > - Note: Removed the period at the end of the 2nd sentence... just to > keep it in limit > > *Facebook/Google+:* >> >> • This #Wikipedia editor devoted hundreds of hours to one article. >> • Ever wonder why #Wikipedia's articles on the #Texas Revolution are so >> good? 80 hours identifying sources, an untold number of hours reading them, >> and 300 hours of writing. That's just one of the people who worked on it. >> • 80 hours identifying sources, an untold number of hours reading them, >> and 300 hours of writing. And that's just one of the people who worked on >> it. >> >> thanks, >> Joe >> > > I'm thinking #2 > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > > -- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________ Social-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
