We've shared:

FB: https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153431035108346

@Wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/628595487982141440
@Wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/628595488040853504

WP G+:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/100123345029543043288/+Wikipedia/posts/JvJbTPotepg
WMF G+:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/108193079736330787108/108193079736330787108/posts/cb4ntxEiB1H

On 4 August 2015 at 16:05, Joe Sutherland <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think avoiding tags (in favour of using an image) would be the best
> idea. Tweets with images I believe tend to do better anyway. Thoughts?
>
> Joe
>
> On 4 August 2015 at 06:30, James Alexander <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I tend to agree more tweets would be better from us :) A multi-tweet
>> sounds like a good compromise.
>>
>> James Alexander
>> Community Advocacy
>> Wikimedia Foundation
>> (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Ed Erhart <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Why not multiple tweets, one of which has the mentions? We don't send
>>> out enough tweets anyway IMHO, and it's a good way to personally yet
>>> publicly acknowledge them.
>>>
>>> --Ed
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:39 PM, James Alexander <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Article looks good, while I watched it from home (it was one of those
>>>> days sadly) I loved how the speakers actually had wildly different views at
>>>> times which has not always been the case for these events (which is not
>>>> required :) I enjoyed those too ). SM Comments inline
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Yana Welinder <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Looks great!  Do we want to include the speakers' twitter handles so
>>>>> that they retweet it to their followers? If so, here they are:
>>>>> @PamelaSamuelson @LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword @melvingibbs @yanatweets
>>>>>
>>>>> Feel free to leave me out if you run out of characters. I'll retweet
>>>>> it regardless. :)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Hmm, I give some options below (even without mentioning you it's too
>>>> long without adjustment) but I'd actually stay away from mentions given how
>>>> many there are. I just think the tweet itself starts to become so cluttered
>>>> it's hard to use and understand for the average reader. That would end up
>>>> with 5-6 different links in the tweet which is pretty rough.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Joe Sutherland <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We just published "Wikimedia Foundation hosts lively panel on
>>>>>> copyright" to the blog. URL:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Many thanks to Lexie, Yana and Michelle for this post.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):*
>>>>>> • Wikimedia Foundation Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright.
>>>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> • Wikimedia hosts copyright experts debating recent mass digitization
>>>>>> policy proposal.
>>>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    - Both LGTM, personally I'd avoid mentions (picking just 1 or 2 to
>>>>    mention isn't fair and all 4-5 makes it very cluttered) and go with the 
>>>> 2nd
>>>>    one but I'm happy with both :). If we want to do the mentions then we'd
>>>>    probably have to take #1 and adjust it for length. Some options below.
>>>>    - Wikimedia Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @
>>>>       PamelaSamuelson <https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson> @
>>>>       LilaBaileyLaw <https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw> @dreamword
>>>>       <https://twitter.com/dreamword> @melvingibbs
>>>>       <https://twitter.com/melvingibbs>
>>>>       https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ 
>>>> [6char
>>>>       left]
>>>>       - WMF Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @
>>>>       PamelaSamuelson <https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson> @
>>>>       LilaBaileyLaw <https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw> @dreamword
>>>>       <https://twitter.com/dreamword> @melvingibbs
>>>>       <https://twitter.com/melvingibbs> @yanatweets
>>>>       <https://twitter.com/yanatweets>
>>>>       https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ [0
>>>>       left]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Facebook/Google+:*
>>>>>> • The Wikimedia Foundation hosts leading voices on copyright for a
>>>>>> lively panel on mass digitization.
>>>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>> Joe
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> *Joe Sutherland*
>>>>>> Communications Intern [remote]
>>>>>> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w:
>>>>>> JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> FB/G+ LGTM
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Social-media mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ed Erhart
>>> Editorial Intern
>>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Social-media mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Social-media mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Joe Sutherland*
> Communications Intern [remote]
> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w:
> JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)>
>



-- 
*Joe Sutherland*
Communications Intern [remote]
m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w:
JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)>
_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media

Reply via email to