Yeah, especially since we're posting from @Wikipedia I don't think it's needed either.
It is a bit passive aggressive but it gets the point of the article across and I'm not sure it's possible to do that without being a bit either passive or actively aggressive ;) James Alexander Community Advocacy Wikimedia Foundation (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Joe Sutherland <[email protected]> wrote: > LGTM. I don't think it's a good idea to hashtag Wikipedia based on > Michael's advice on searches for that term though. > > best, > Joe > > On 7 August 2015 at 22:51, Ed Erhart <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> We just published "Wikipedia better equipped to deal with systemic bias >> than traditional publishers" to the Wikimedia blog. >> >> >> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/07/systemic-bias-wikipedia-vs-publishers >> >> Comments on the tone would be appreciated—I veered a little bit into >> passive-aggressive territory. >> >> >> >> *Twitter:*The Basic Art series from @TASCHENBooks is missing 100 famous >> women, but #Wikipedia has them all. >> >> >> >> *Facebook/G+:*The Basic Art series from Taschen Books is missing 100 >> famous women, but #Wikipedia has them all. >> >> -- >> Ed Erhart >> Editorial Intern >> Wikimedia Foundation >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Social-media mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >> >> > > > -- > *Joe Sutherland* > Communications Intern [remote] > m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w: > JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)> > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > >
_______________________________________________ Social-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
