We've shared: FB: https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153467094233346
@Wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/633663780774391808 @Wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/633663780749213696 WP G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/100123345029543043288/+Wikipedia/posts/1wqRZYYC2vg WMF G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/108193079736330787108/108193079736330787108/posts/XCe2CydAnTS On 17 August 2015 at 22:25, Joe Sutherland <[email protected]> wrote: > Good catch—should read "almost", not sure how that got in there. > > Joe > > On 17 August 2015 at 22:18, Jan Ainali <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Just thinking on the opening sentence int he blog: "For over fifteen >> years, the scope of topics that Wikipedia covers has grown steadily." >> Should it really be _over fifteen_? >> >> >> *Med vänliga hälsningar,Jan Ainali* >> >> Verksamhetschef, Wikimedia Sverige <http://wikimedia.se> >> 0729 - 67 29 48 >> >> >> *Tänk dig en värld där varje människa har fri tillgång till >> mänsklighetens samlade kunskap. Det är det vi gör.* >> Bli medlem. <http://blimedlem.wikimedia.se> >> >> >> 2015-08-17 22:54 GMT+02:00 James Alexander <[email protected]>: >> >>> Thanks Joe! I'm glad to see your thesis up! Great piece and if anyone >>> gets a chance to read the full thesis (obviously longer) you should!. >>> Social comments in line. >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Joe Sutherland < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey all, >>>> >>>> We just published "How Wikipedia responds to breaking news" to the >>>> blog. URL: >>>> >>>> http://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/17/wikipedia-breaking-news/ >>>> >>>> Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed. >>>> >>>> *Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* >>>> • How does Wikipedia respond to breaking news? >>>> http://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/17/wikipedia-breaking-news/ >>>> >>> >>> Looks good overall, happy with this if you'd prefer but perhaps a bit >>> of an answer to tease them (like below)? perhaps: >>> >>> >>> - How does Wikipedia respond to breaking news? Awfully like a >>> newsroom it turns out. >>> http://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/17/wikipedia-breaking-news/ >>> >>> >>>> *Facebook/Google+:* >>>> • "Overall, the study shows that Wikipedia works on breaking news much >>>> like a traditional newsroom—verifiability is held in high regard, and a >>>> 'core group' of editors tend to contribute a vast majority of the content." >>>> http://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/17/wikipedia-breaking-news/ >>>> >>> >>> LGTM >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Social-media mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Social-media mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >> >> > > > -- > *Joe Sutherland* > Communications Intern [remote] > m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w: > JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)> > -- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w: JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)>
_______________________________________________ Social-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
