Hey all, We just published "Despite headlines, frequent edits don’t cause inaccuracy" to the blog. URL:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/18/controversy-and-edit-rates/ Many thanks to everyone involved for this post. Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed. *Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* • Citation needed: study finds edit rates correlate with controversy, not reliability https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/18/controversy-and-edit-rates/ *Facebook/Google+:* • "In true Wikipedian spirit, we believe any research should be assessed and reported with rigor and care." https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/18/controversy-and-edit-rates/ thanks, Joe -- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w: JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)>
_______________________________________________ Social-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
