From @wikimedia: https://twitter.com/terakasorotany/status/640233691478929409
(That's https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jagwar in case someone want to contact him about syndicating the post or such. Chances to cover Wiktionary are rare ... ) On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Tilman Bayer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Gregory Varnum <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Responses below. >> >> -greg >> >> >> On Aug 13, 2015, at 12:57 AM, James Alexander <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Thoughts inline >> >> James Alexander >> Community Advocacy >> Wikimedia Foundation >> (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur >> >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Tilman Bayer <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> from @wikipedia and @mediawiki: >>> https://twitter.com/wikidata/status/631460768249200641 >>> >> No real issues from mediawiki but this one worries me a bit from >> @wikipedia. It just sounds a bit too technical/inside baseball. Even I read >> it and went "arbitrary access? WTF is that?" before thinking harder and >> realizing they mean being able to call within templates etc. I worry that >> the vast majority of our audience would have no idea what this is. >> >> >> Agree that it is appropriate for @mw - seems less so for @wp >> > OK, done from @mediawiki only. No strong feelings about that one, but just > as a general remark I think there is often value in (re)tweeting something > that might not be 100% accessible to all followers, but gives even laypeople > sort of an ambient sense of awareness ("OK, I don't fully understand what's > going on there, but nice that there's apparently progress with Wikidata and > Wikipedia".) >> >> >>> from @wikipedia: >>> >>> https://twitter.com/WikimediaCH/status/626066626308407296 >>> >> Fine by me as long as we're ok with calling it Wikipedia's medical >> encyclopedia (possibly implying it's an official app?). >> >> >> I’m on the fence about these personally - has mobile weighed in on these >> set of apps? >> > You're both raising good points, but Kiwix and Wikiproject Med have a good > reputation in the movement for what they do, and as a default assumption I > would trust a major chapter to use the "Wikipedia" mark responsibly and > adequately. (I'm actually working in the WMF Reading team, i.e. the > engineering department responsible for mobile including the main WP apps, > although this RT suggestion does not constitute a papal blessing or anything > ;) > I am more concerned about an official WMF-run Twitter account promoting > Wikiwand, as it happened recently. >> >> >>> from @wikicommons and perhaps others: >>> https://twitter.com/benglabs/status/629966289574957056 >>> https://twitter.com/Pyb75/status/629670299580125185 >> >> >> LGTM >> >> >> LGTM from @wc and @wp - maybe @wm >> >> >>> >>> >>> from @mediawiki, the first one perhaps also from @wikipedia: >>> https://twitter.com/brionv/status/629733830547509248 >> >> >> mayyyybe from @wikipedia, fairly technical though. @mediawiki for sure >>> >>> >>> https://twitter.com/brionv/status/630384030509207552 >> >> >> LGTM for @mediawiki >> >> >> +1 for just @mw only >> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> from @wikimedia and perhaps others: >>> https://twitter.com/danjarratt/status/631139320997392385 >> >> >> LGTM for @wikimedia/@wikipedia/@wikicommons >> >> >> +1 for all three >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Social-media mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Social-media mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >> > > > > -- > Tilman Bayer > Senior Analyst > Wikimedia Foundation > IRC (Freenode): HaeB -- Tilman Bayer Senior Analyst Wikimedia Foundation IRC (Freenode): HaeB _______________________________________________ Social-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
