I like that for FB and Twitter. -greg
_______________ Sent from my iPhone - a more detailed response may be sent later. > On Sep 21, 2015, at 3:20 PM, Juliet Barbara <[email protected]> wrote: > > How about something straightforward like: > > Should you pay for a Wikipedia article? Find out here. [LINK] > >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Ed Erhart <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This is now published after a snafu with WordPress' scheduling mechanism. >> Further proposed Facebook posts: >> "Wikipedia is, after all, an encyclopedia—not a commercial directory." >> No, you should not hire a paid editor who does not disclose that fact on >> Wikipedia. >> --Ed >> >>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Pine W <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I guess a further refinement: it can be free of financial obligation in >>> order to participate in Wikipedia in many ways, but plenty of people and >>> organizations are being paid for their involvement, so we need to be >>> careful about the messaging. >>> >>> Pine >>> >>>> On Sep 19, 2015 1:38 PM, "Pine W" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Agreed that we should drop any suggestions that everyone who creates >>>> content or does other work is doing so for free. Wikipedia is free (of >>>> financial obligation) as in free to read and share, not as in free to >>>> create, store, maintain, defend, reseaech, and develop. >>>> >>>> Pine >>>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Ed Erhart >> Editorial Associate >> Wikimedia Foundation > > > > -- > Juliet Barbara > Senior Communications Manager I Wikimedia Foundation > 149 New Montgomery Street I San Francisco, CA 94105 > [email protected] I +1 (512) 750-5677 > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
_______________________________________________ Social-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
