Looks good, though I'm not sure where the "help us understand" bit comes in. Is that just to qualify that we don't have a cause?
On 25 September 2015 at 18:48, Ed Erhart <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > We just published "Wikipedia’s very active editor numbers have > stabilized—delve into the data with us" to the blog. Thanks to Aaron, Neil, > and Dario for their help with the post! > > Proposed social media messages: > > > *Facebook/Google+/Twitter:* > > - The English Wikipedia's number of very active editors appears to > have stabilized. Help us understand why. > > -- > Ed Erhart > Editorial Associate > Wikimedia Foundation > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > > -- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w: JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)>
_______________________________________________ Social-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
