Thanks for the list. Can we do French
<http://blog.wikimedia.org/fr/2015/10/19/decouvrez-les-photographies-propres-a-vous-couper-le-souffle-qui-remportent-le-concours-wiki-loves-earth-2015/>,
Brazilian Portuguese
<http://blog.wikimedia.org/pt-br/2015/10/19/veja-as-belissimas-fotografias-vencedoras-do-wiki-loves-earth-2015/>,
and Spanish
<https://blog.wikimedia.org/es/2015/10/16/mira-las-asombrosas-fotografias-ganadoras-del-concurso-wiki-loves-earth-2015>?
We also have Polish and German, but those are going to yield much smaller
returns.

--Ed

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Michael Guss <[email protected]> wrote:

> If we want to prioritize languages by audience size,
>
> I'd say at least Spanish. Here's the current list of most popular language
> interfaces of our followers.
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Ed Erhart <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We have translations for this post in Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, German,
>> Macedonian, Spanish, Swedish, Portuguese, and Ukrainian (plus Brazilian
>> Portuguese is missing only one caption). Would it be worthwhile to post
>> links on Facebook and geotarget, using the second sentence as a tagline?
>> I'm not sure how many fans we have in each language.
>>
>> --Ed
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Katherine Maher <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Pine W <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks all.
>>>>
>>>> I am guessing that most our social followers support Wikimedia content
>>>> and the Wikimedia platform. So:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Would a petition to FB from thousands of followers make a difference?
>>>>
>>> Maybe, but that's a campaign we'd want to design with allied
>>> organizations for maximum impact, which requires coordination and
>>> resourcing not currently in the Annual Plan. So, per James, that's a
>>> 12-18mo goal.
>>>
>>>> 2. I am thinking that well designed, short social posts that excite our
>>>> followers into clicking links to content on our platform might be
>>>> sufficient for our goals. Thoughts? This ties in with Luis' comment about
>>>> closed web versus open web; FB gains from closed web, and we gain from open
>>>> web, so strategically I think that we would want to encourage our followers
>>>> to venture out to the open web and onto our platform.
>>>>
>>> We should always strive for well designed, short social posts that
>>> excite our followers! Especially in a way that supports the open web. But
>>> sub-optimally rendered images don't quite get us there (and right now,
>>> there's no current roadmap in the product teams for better social platform
>>> rendering/performance for Commons images). Lessons learned from highly
>>> visual accounts (NASA, US Dept. of Interior) suggest any intermediation of
>>> the image is an immediate loss factor. I don't want to speak for Jeff,
>>> whose remit this all is, but between total closed-web capitulation and
>>> idealism, I settle into the slightly less exciting groove of pragmatism on
>>> what we can do with what we have.
>>>
>>>> Pine
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Social-media mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Katherine Maher
>>> Chief Communications Officer
>>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>> 149 New Montgomery Street
>>> San Francisco, CA 94105
>>>
>>> +1 (415) 839-6885 ext. 6635
>>> +1 (415) 712 4873
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Social-media mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ed Erhart
>> Editorial Associate
>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Social-media mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Michael Guss
> Research Analyst
> Wikimediafoundation.org
> [email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Social-media mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>
>


-- 
Ed Erhart
Editorial Associate
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media

Reply via email to