On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 02:06 +0200, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> Smoot Carl-Mitchell wrote:
> > This primary was mild by most standards.  What we had was basically a
> > tie, due to the proportional delegate allocation.  In a winner take all
> > system by state, Clinton would have easily won on Super Tuesday.
> 
> I think winner take all systems are hugely unfair and undemocratic.

I agree, but our Electroal College system is winner take all by state.
An argument can be made that a winner take all primary system reflects
the current Electoral College reality.  Personally, I would like to see
the Electoral College abolished and replaced with a popular vote system.

> And doesn't have the problem of her being Obama's running mate. I hope 
> he picks John Edwards.

I want to see Edwards as Attorney General.  He would be terrific in that
position.
-- 
Smoot Carl-Mitchell
System/Network Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 480 922 7313
cell: +1 602 421 9005

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to