anders conbere wrote: > On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> This sounds similar to remote/shared roster groups -- I allow some other >> entity to modify a portion of my roster. So for instance if you are a >> member of the XSF -- and you guys really should be, we have an open >> membership application period right now! [1] -- then your "XSF" group >> could be maintained by the Secretary of the XSF and therefore it would >> be automatically updated when new members are elected. We have been >> thinking about this kind of feature for a long time. Most of the XMPP >> server implementations have it but not in a distributed way -- they tie >> it to LDAP groups inside an organization so that when Suzy joins the >> marketing department or Bill gets fired in QA, your roster changes >> without any interaction on your part. Doing this in a decentralized >> manner is a bit harder, but I'm interested in solving the problem. > > This sounds close, I suspect that details about my specific use cases > could be ironed out in the broader XEP discussions. That particular > discussion sounds like it's about modifying a group of roster items > that would be distributed to a set of users, where as mine would only > be distributed to a single particular user. This sounds like a subset > of the functionality of the above but I'm interested in at least > recognizing that use case before looking into solutions.
Sure, in your use case there's only one subscriber to the remote roster group. Just a special case. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
