On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:29, Dave Cridland <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu Apr 29 17:20:36 2010, bear wrote:
>>
>> I'm not talking about server side issues - the server should pass the
>> Atom portion on to the client just like it does everything else.
>>
>> The *client* tho should be able to handle Atom and create a
>> displayable item from the Atom - it requires similar parsing issues as
>> XHTML-IM IMO
>>
>>
> Well... leaving aside for a moment whether clients should understand Atom
> for other reasons, it strikes me that given that much of the information in
> the Atom portion is static and not actually related to this message, per-se,
> can't it be requested on demand? And doesn't this entire thing start to
> suggest that really, OMB/XMPP should be using something more complex for
> "willing participants", as compared to just bombarding clients with Atom?

That was one of my thoughts as I was reading your first post/question
-- why not provide the source id (or url) and let clients who
require/want the Atom items to request it as needed if they don't want
to send to the server the DISCO item to enable full Atom support

>
> I mean - yes, absolutely, support naïve clients which haven't the faintest
> idea they're talking to an OMB service, but I don't see those as likely to
> understand all the Atom blurb anyway. Oh the other hand, if a client *knows*
> about "OMB/XMPP", it can do clever stuff, and keep itself updated with all
> the profile data it needs without it being sent continuously with every
> message, and therefore doesn't need the full Atom blurb...
>
>
>> But what Kevin suggests in his reply I suspect is the real answer -
>> the Identica bot should grok client capabilities and not send all the
>> stuff in the first place.
>>
>>
> Right - but what about when clients are offline? Is it a case of
> last-known-state wins? The trouble being we're assuming the last case will
> be the next - if you're alternating between  Atom/XHTML-IM aware client and
> a non-aware, maybe mobile, client, you'll be gettign precisely the wrong
> behaviour.

I suspect that this is the root of why it's all included, well, that
and the fact that Twitter sends *everything*


>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Cridland - mailto:[email protected] - xmpp:[email protected]
>  - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
>  - http://dave.cridland.net/
> Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
>



-- 
Bear

[email protected] (email)
[email protected] (xmpp, email)
[email protected] (xmpp, email)
http://code-bear.com/bearlog (weblog)

PGP Fingerprint = 9996 719F 973D B11B E111  D770 9331 E822 40B3 CD29

Reply via email to