Okay, I've looked at it in the list archives at http://csf.colorado.edu/forums/pkt/2003II/msg00174.html . In that post you refer to "the three fundamental axioms below." But below I see sixteen steps.
Before that you say: "I believe that axiomatically setting the "What", "Why", and "Who" The Economy is for, renders a good enough base." Fine. Now, What, Why and Who add up to three. I can only presume they are what you are calling your "three basic axioms"? But they look to be merely questions. Where are the axioms? What are the "axiomatic settings" that lead to your bold conclusions, which are not so bold or original, as I've already pointed out? Is this what you call "rigour" in logic--to stand on axioms that are hidden; that when challenged to show the axioms, to refer to another post in which the axioms are also hidden? Show us the axioms! Otherwise, we will have to assume that your step 2 is itself nothing more than an arbitrarily chosen axiom. I will challenge it on that basis alone, if you prefer. I think the determination whether or not it is you who are actually the crank does hinge on the caliber of your response. Bill -- --------- Original Message --------- DATE: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 08:06:39 From: John Vertegaal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: > >If you want to know my three axioms Bill, I would suggest reading the post >"A Third Way?" of a few weeks back. > >John > > ____________________________________________________________ Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail! http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005 ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84IaC.bcVIgP.YXJjaGl2 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html ==^================================================================
