By "sender" I presume he means me. I sent it for the purposes of discussion. I do not endorse it.
As to missing the point of binary economics, what is the point?
---original message--- From: "W. Curtiss Priest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "List, Social Credit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [SOCIAL CREDIT] binary economics critique Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 10:25:19 -0400
I forward this one line from Prof. Ashford:
"It is clear from their analysis, the author and sender miss the point of binary economics"
Regards,
Curtiss --
W. Curtiss Priest, Director, CITS Research Affiliate, Comparative Media Studies, MIT Center for Information, Technology & Society 466 Pleasant St., Melrose, MA 02176 781-662-4044 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://Cybertrails.org
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84IaC.bcVIgP.YXJjaGl2 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html ==^================================================================
