[Rodney Shakespeare]  The definition would therefore
be "binary full payout of earnings paying the full
return (net of reserves for depreciation, research
and development."
----------------------

But what is your definition of earnings - earnings -
earnings - earnings - earnings?  Trying to get you to
answer is like pulling teeth.  Synonyms:  profit,
returns to capital.  I want to know how you would
define it as a matter of accounting.

Definitions are important.  The fact that there are
many possible definitions does not mean each of them
is equally valid.  We might define pi to be three but
the only proper definition is the circumference of
the circle divided by its diameter.  If we substitute
three for pi in our calculations it is certain we
will get erroneous results.

By the way, by allowing for reserves (for anything) you
are calling for something other than full payout.
Is it impossible for you to see the contradiction?
--


[Rodney Shakespeare] I object to your reference to Michael Greaney. You have continually libeled him in a way that was never necessary. ----------------------

Where is the libel in my last post?  Are you
inferring that my characterization of his views on
depreciation is inaccurate?  Indeed, where have I
ever libeled him?  I think you also said I libeled
you.

This was from Norm Kurland:

->In your last posting you challenged the proposition
that depreciation could be a source of non-wage-based
supplemental cash for closing the purchasing power
gap within a binary economic system, a system which
would also serve to close the gap by expanding the
base in society who share supplemental ownership
incomes in such production-connected forms as
dividends, cash profit sharing and cash productivity
bonuses.  That purchasing power gap can largely be
traceable to the retention of earnings within
productive enterprises, a situation that could be
avoided if companies (1) paid out fully their pretax
profits as dividends to people ready to consume what
the economy produces and (2) the nation's monetary
authorities and banking system would supply
sufficient capital credit to meet the economy's
overall needs for economically-feasible new capital
formation reflected in the form of self-liquidating
leveraged acquisitions of newly-issued equity shares
for workers and citizens generally.  We also would
argue that depreciation could also serve as an
alternative to "creating money" disconnected with
ownership rights under the National Dividend Plan as
advocated by you and other advocates.

In response to your objections to our discussion of
depreciation as one possible source of cash for
increasing mass purchasing power, I (one trained
merely in the law and economics program at the
University of Chicago Law School with only a lawyer's
understanding of accounting) have asked my colleague
Michael Greaney, who is a CPA with MBA credentials)
to address your points from his several decades of
professional experience... <-

Then from Greaney:

->Further, I agree with...the quoted sections [from
Kurland] in your missive, particularly in that, in
large measure, I wrote them. <-
--


[Kurland from the above] That purchasing power gap can largely be traceable to the retention of earnings within productive enterprises, a situation that could be avoided if companies (1) paid out fully their pretax profits as dividends to people ready to consume what the economy produces... ----------------------

But seventy-three years ago Douglas told the
Macmillan Committee that was impossible.  I can just
see that little pipsqueak Kelso chortling to himself-
with a sneer on his face, "What a stupid feller that
Mayjer Douglas iz!  He almost got it but didn't quite
git it.  Don't need no nashnil diveedends!  Don't
need no reetail deescounts!  All we got to do is pass
a law to make corporations paiout their profeets!"

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus


--^----------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84IaC.bcVIgP.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
--^----------------------------------------------------------------




Reply via email to