v) Work rules that prevent the efficient use of new technology etc.
The Kelsos say that if people owned the capital a three-shift (instead of
one-shift) use of capital would be much more acceptable to the owners.
Dear Rodney,
It may indeed be more acceptable to the 'owners', but would that "three-shift use of capital" be more acceptable to those who have to work under such conditions? I know it certainly wouldn't be to me, if I were a worker subjected to them. And where do you go from there? Seven day a week, 365 day a year operations? Run the plant right through meal times and coffee breaks, all in pursuit of that maximum profit? It seems to me that this is one of the drawbacks to binary economics versus social credit. Your system appears to me to be pushing production to achieve a 'financial return'. And even though that return may be more broadly distributed, it's still not the proper primary reason for our having an industrial system. I found your new website quite interesting, and there's no doubt you raise questions about many issues that should be looked into, and B.E. may be more compatible with Islam, but I still think Social Credit is a far better solution for us in this country. (In spite of all the arguing we do on here sometimes in regards to all the technical details.)
Joe Thomson
--^^--------------------------------------------------------------- This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84IaC.bcVIgP.YXJjaGl2 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html --^^---------------------------------------------------------------
