Matthias Fuchs wrote: > On Friday 11 December 2009 15:22, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> Hi Matthias, >> >> Matthias Fuchs wrote: >>> Hi Wolfgang, >>> >>> On Thursday 10 December 2009 16:52, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >>>>> Do you think the above changes are correct? >>>> Well, no, I now remember that I have done some porting for 2.6.18. Dig, >>>> dig, dig... see attachment. It was for the old "netlink" branch, though. >>> We finally got it up and running. So at least the esd_331 driver works >>> under 2.6.18 >>> so far. >>> >>> Thanks for the patch. >> Great, patches for the head of SVN trunk are welcome. And nice to see >> that SVN trunk is still useful for older kernels. >> >> Have a nice weekend. >> >> Wolfgang. >> > Now I got the initial version of the recently posted esd_usb2 driver running > under 2.6.18 (the goal!). But I must admit that some parts of the statistic > keeping > and usb cleanup handling (usb_anchor...) are currently commented out.
Puh, I expect many differences concerning the USB interface. > During testing I noticed a problem with loopback behavior. It's the same > problem > I ran into a while ago with 2.6.30: I always receive sent > frames on the same socket. The sockets behave as if CAN_RAW_RECV_OWN_MSGS is > enabled. > > Wolfgang, did you run into this issue when you did the sysfs 2.6.18 backport? > Any ideas where to dig? IIRC, I did not do some serious testing with 2.6.18 but I don't think it has anything to do with the sysfs interface. Wolfgang. Wolfgang. _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
