On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Paul Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, I had originally thought osm was needed because when I watched an open > bus. I would see continuous traffic after a send. I didn't want to get into > a situation where if one of 4 nodes died the retries to the dead node ate up > the whole bus, but that's NOT what I see. As long as there is 1 good node, a > packet to a non-existent node is not retried. So ASAP I will prepare the patch for netdev-next without OSM for the mcp2515. -- Christian Pellegrin, see http://www.evolware.org/chri/ "Real Programmers don't play tennis, or any other sport which requires you to change clothes. Mountain climbing is OK, and Real Programmers wear their climbing boots to work in case a mountain should suddenly spring up in the middle of the computer room." _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
