On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:59:26PM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Markus Plessing wrote: > > Fix compiler errors with recent net-next-2.6 for 2.6.33 > > - Removed IRQInfo1 (as for irq_req_t) > > - window_handle_t is now unsigned long instead of window_t* > > - pcmcia_request_window needs now only a pointer, not pointer to pointer > > - pass struct pcmcia_device pointer to pcmcia_map_mem_page > > - Replaced cs_error function with dbg_err > > > > Signed-off-by: Markus Plessing <[email protected]> > > --- > > > > Index: kernel/2.6/drivers/net/can/sja1000/ems_pcmcia.c > > =================================================================== > > --- kernel/2.6/drivers/net/can/sja1000/ems_pcmcia.c (Revision 1126) > > +++ kernel/2.6/drivers/net/can/sja1000/ems_pcmcia.c (Arbeitskopie) > > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ > > /* > > * Copyright (C) 2008 Sebastian Haas <[email protected]> > > + * Copyright (C) 2010 Markus Plessing <[email protected]> > > I think we said that the modifications are not significant enough to > claim authorship but it's fine if you change MODULE_AUTHOR as you > overtake maintainer-chip. You seem to have understood the contrary.
? I think he got it right. MODULE_AUTHOR claims, well, authorship of the file. Copyright may also be claimed for significant changes. One could argue, if these changes are significant enough, but as both come from the same company, it probably doesn't matter. -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
