Sriramakrishnan wrote:
> Added the suspend and resume implementation in the HECC (CAN)
> driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: K R Baalaaji <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Sriramakrishnan <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Anant Gole <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/net/can/ti_hecc.c |   51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/ti_hecc.c b/drivers/net/can/ti_hecc.c
> index 5c993c2..df27d82 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/ti_hecc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/ti_hecc.c
> @@ -824,7 +824,6 @@ static int ti_hecc_open(struct net_device *ndev)
>               return err;
>       }
>  
> -     clk_enable(priv->clk);
>       ti_hecc_start(ndev);
>       napi_enable(&priv->napi);
>       netif_start_queue(ndev);
> @@ -840,7 +839,6 @@ static int ti_hecc_close(struct net_device *ndev)
>       napi_disable(&priv->napi);
>       ti_hecc_stop(ndev);
>       free_irq(ndev->irq, ndev);
> -     clk_disable(priv->clk);
>       close_candev(ndev);
>  
>       return 0;
> @@ -925,6 +923,7 @@ static int ti_hecc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>       netif_napi_add(ndev, &priv->napi, ti_hecc_rx_poll,
>               HECC_DEF_NAPI_WEIGHT);
>  
> +     clk_enable(priv->clk);
>       err = register_candev(ndev);
>       if (err) {
>               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "register_candev() failed\n");
> @@ -953,6 +952,7 @@ static int __devexit ti_hecc_remove(struct 
> platform_device *pdev)
>       struct net_device *ndev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>       struct ti_hecc_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
>  
> +     clk_disable(priv->clk);
>       clk_put(priv->clk);
>       res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>       iounmap(priv->base);
> @@ -964,6 +964,48 @@ static int __devexit ti_hecc_remove(struct 
> platform_device *pdev)
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +static int ti_hecc_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev, pm_message_t state)
> +{
> +     struct net_device *dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +     struct ti_hecc_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> +
> +     if (netif_running(dev)) {
> +             netif_stop_queue(dev);
> +             netif_device_detach(dev);
> +     }
> +
> +     hecc_set_bit(priv, HECC_CANMC, HECC_CANMC_PDR);
> +     priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_SLEEPING;
> +
> +     clk_disable(priv->clk);
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ti_hecc_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +     struct net_device *dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +     struct ti_hecc_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> +
> +     clk_enable(priv->clk);
> +
> +     hecc_clear_bit(priv, HECC_CANMC, HECC_CANMC_PDR);
> +     priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE;
> +
> +     if (netif_running(dev)) {
> +             netif_device_attach(dev);
> +             netif_start_queue(dev);
> +     }
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +#else
> +#define ti_hecc_suspend NULL
> +#define ti_hecc_resume NULL
> +#endif
> +
>  /* TI HECC netdevice driver: platform driver structure */
>  static struct platform_driver ti_hecc_driver = {
>       .driver = {
> @@ -972,6 +1014,8 @@ static struct platform_driver ti_hecc_driver = {
>       },
>       .probe = ti_hecc_probe,
>       .remove = __devexit_p(ti_hecc_remove),
> +     .suspend = ti_hecc_suspend,
> +     .resume = ti_hecc_resume,
>  };
>  
>  static int __init ti_hecc_init_driver(void)
> @@ -979,14 +1023,15 @@ static int __init ti_hecc_init_driver(void)
>       printk(KERN_INFO DRV_DESC "\n");
>       return platform_driver_register(&ti_hecc_driver);
>  }
> -module_init(ti_hecc_init_driver);
>  
>  static void __exit ti_hecc_exit_driver(void)
>  {
>       printk(KERN_INFO DRV_DESC " unloaded\n");
>       platform_driver_unregister(&ti_hecc_driver);
>  }
> +
>  module_exit(ti_hecc_exit_driver);
> +module_init(ti_hecc_init_driver);

What is the reason for moving around module_init? Please revert. Then
you can add my "Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <[email protected]>".

Thanks,

Wolfgang.
_______________________________________________
Socketcan-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core

Reply via email to