On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:36:25AM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Hi Ira,
> 
> Ira W. Snyder wrote:
> > Hello SocketCAN folks,
> > 
> > Is there any feedback on this patch? I've waited two weeks without a
> > response to any part of the series. As this is the biggest patch in the
> > series, if you're fine with it, I think the other supporting patches
> > should be fairly uncontroversial.
> 
> For some strange reason this patch did not show up in my socketcan mbox,
> sorry. At least I cannot find it. Oliver, or somebody else, did you
> receive it? Nevertheless, for kernel inclusion the patch should go
> through the netdev mailing list as described in:
> 
> http://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/socketcan/trunk/README.submitting-patches
> 
> It's also confusing that one 2/3 shows up on the Socketcan-core ML. At
> least 0/3 should also be presented there.
> 
> Could you please resubmit?
> 

Sure, I'll resubmit.

The patch showed up just fine on socketcan-core for me (I'm subscribed).
It also showed up on LKML (I'm not subscribed). I'll make sure to CC
everyone with patch 0/3, as well as CC'ing netdev.

Thanks,
Ira
_______________________________________________
Socketcan-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core

Reply via email to