On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Fawad Lateef <[email protected]> wrote: > > So now rather fixing that issue in old driver, I took latest svn-tree > and trying to make it asynchronous. My current approach is to leave > all the rx error processing as it is in work-handler but do > normal-packets processing without deferring them. Any comment on this > ?
Your work looks very interesting but I really cannot comment/help without seeing the code, it' definitely a heavy rewrite of the driver. Personally after switching to software interrupts I haven't had any performance issues, but it would be cool to have a driver using just spi_async. -- Christian Pellegrin, see http://www.evolware.org/chri/ "Real Programmers don't play tennis, or any other sport which requires you to change clothes. Mountain climbing is OK, and Real Programmers wear their climbing boots to work in case a mountain should suddenly spring up in the middle of the computer room." _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
