> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 10:04 AM
> To: Wang, Qi
> Cc: Daniel Baluta; Masayuki Ohtak; [email protected]; Wolfgang
> Grandegger; [email protected]; [email protected]; Khor,
> Andrew Chih Howe; [email protected]; Wang, Yong Y
> Subject: Re: [MeeGo-Dev][PATCH] Topcliff: Update PCH_CAN driver to 2.6.35
> 
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 09:42:27AM +0800, Wang, Qi wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Daniel Baluta [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 6:37 PM
> > > To: Masayuki Ohtak
> > > Cc: [email protected]; Wolfgang Grandegger;
> > > [email protected]; [email protected]; Khor, Andrew
> Chih
> > > Howe; [email protected]; [email protected]; Wang, Qi; Wang, Yong Y
> > > Subject: Re: [MeeGo-Dev][PATCH] Topcliff: Update PCH_CAN driver to
> 2.6.35
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > 2010/8/11 Masayuki Ohtak <[email protected]>:
> > > > CAN driver of Topcliff PCH
> > > >
> > > > Topcliff PCH is the platform controller hub that is going to be used in
> > > > Intel's upcoming general embedded platform. All IO peripherals in
> > > > Topcliff PCH are actually devices sitting on AMBA bus.
> > > > Topcliff PCH has CAN I/F. This driver enables CAN function.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Masayuki Ohtake <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > I have a few questions:
> > >
> > > 1. Is your code based on Intel's CAN EP80579 ([1]) ?
> > No.
> > > 2. Why don't you use kernel existing kfifo infrastructure? ([2]).
> > Just take a look at kfifo.h. This structure has been changed. I
> > remembered there was a spin_lock from kfifo previously. Currently it's
> > been removed, good.
> > OKI-sans, would you please take a look at ./include/linux/kfifo.h, and try 
> > to
> use this structure and APIs?
> >
> > Daniel,
> >
> > We're anxious to integrate those codes now. Perhaps it'll take us
> > quite a long time to use kfifo. How about implementing it with the
> > next version?
> 
> What do you mean by this?  Code isn't merged into the tree unless it is
> correct.  Please fix this now, it's not that big of a deal.

Hi Ohtak-san,

Would you please use kfifo structure? It'll take you some time to study it, but 
it's a good structure.
> 
> > > 3. Can you provide a pointer to Topcliff PCH CAN I/F datasheet ?
> > Currently this datasheet isn't open.
> 
> Even under NDA?  The Linux foundation offers a service to allow
> developers access to data sheets so that they can do kernel development
> and code review.
Hi Andrew,

Can ECG share those datasheet to the open source? Only with that datasheet, the 
upstream can review the source codes from OKI.

Best Regards,
Qi

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
_______________________________________________
Socketcan-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core

Reply via email to