On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 11:03:34PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 10/23/2010 10:15 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >>>> For the patch as-is, please add my Acked-by. > >>> > >>> Thanks, I squashed you patch added you Ack. > >>> I was free to add your S-o-b, too, okay? > >>> > >> > >> Yes, feel free to add my S-o-b also. > > > SoB + Ack from the same person is a bit redundant, no? :) > > The patch contains a squashed patch from Ira (so I added the S-o-b) and > the original patch was Acked. So what should I write in the commit message?
I understood this. Still, I think if someone is okay with squashing the patch (thus the Sob is really needed) that automatically implies an Acked-by, no? Otherwise the patches would have stayed seperate. But still, no big deal and not worth the fuss, just do what you believe is correct :) -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
