From: Dan Rosenberg <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 21:51:04 -0500
> This has already been suggested, and I agree it is a much better > approach. If I take this approach, and find some suitable substitute > for those cases where the socket inode is not available, will you > consider these changes? I will consider an approach where the keys reported allow object tracking equally as the actual pointers allow for right now. I've said that this is my criteria about 3 times now. _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
