Hi Tomoya,
On 11/19/2010 08:36 AM, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 7:16 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote :
>
>>> ......It seems the same line continues forever.
>>
>> Yes, it will continue until you connect the cable, that's normal
>> behavior. But that's not the full sequence. Could you please repeat the
>> test as shown below:
>>
>> First start the following command in a *separate* session.
>> # candump any,0:0,#FFFFFFFF"
>>
>> Then setup and start the CAN controller:
>> # ip link set can0 up type can bitrate 125000
>> # cansend can0 123#deadbeef
>>
>
> I show the result of the above command below,
>
> [r...@localhost can-utils]# candump any,0:0,#FFFFFFFF
> can0 20000020 [8] 00 00 00 00 00 00 08 00 ERRORFRAME
> can0 20000020 [8] 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 ERRORFRAME
> can0 20000020 [8] 00 00 00 00 00 00 18 00 ERRORFRAME
> can0 20000020 [8] 00 00 00 00 00 00 20 00 ERRORFRAME
> can0 20000020 [8] 00 00 00 00 00 00 28 00 ERRORFRAME
> can0 20000020 [8] 00 00 00 00 00 00 30 00 ERRORFRAME
> can0 20000020 [8] 00 00 00 00 00 00 38 00 ERRORFRAME
> can0 20000020 [8] 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 00 ERRORFRAME
> can0 20000020 [8] 00 00 00 00 00 00 48 00 ERRORFRAME
> can0 20000020 [8] 00 00 00 00 00 00 50 00 ERRORFRAME
> can0 20000020 [8] 00 00 00 00 00 00 58 00 ERRORFRAME
The above lines describe bus errors. Therefore it should be
can0 20000088 [8] 00 00 80 19 00 00 58 00 ERRORFRAME
> can0 20000024 [8] 00 00 00 00 00 00 60 00 ERRORFRAME
The TX error counter has reached 96 signaling a can error state change
to "error warning".
> can0 20000024 [8] 00 08 00 00 00 00 68 00 ERRORFRAME
CAN_ERR_CRTL in the id and CAN_ERR_CRTL_TX_WARNING in data[1], but ...
> can0 20000024 [8] 00 08 00 00 00 00 70 00 ERRORFRAME
the state change should be signaled only *once*.
> can0 20000024 [8] 00 08 00 00 00 00 78 00 ERRORFRAME
> can0 20000024 [8] 00 28 00 00 00 00 80 00 ERRORFRAME
"Error passive" state is reached and CAN_ERR_CRTL_TX_PASSIVE sould be
set in data[1], but CAN_ERR_CRTL_TX_WARNING should be removed.
> can0 20000024 [8] 00 28 00 00 00 00 80 00 ERRORFRAME
> can0 20000024 [8] 00 28 00 00 00 00 80 00 ERRORFRAME
> can0 20000024 [8] 00 28 00 00 00 00 80 00 ERRORFRAME
Sounds magic, well, I'm going to prepare a patch as soon as your pending
patch series is applied.
Could you please do the same testing while triggering a bus-off? After
the test, the output of "ip -d -s link" would be interesting as well.
Thanks,
Wolfgang.
_______________________________________________
Socketcan-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
