On 12/16/2010 01:09 PM, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote: > On Thursday, December 16, 2010 6:11 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > >> Ah, oh, I just realized that the register layout is almost identical to >> the recently accepted *pch_can* driver. Tomoya, does pch_can use a c_can >> core? Well, then it makes really sense to have a generic c_can driver >> for the SPEAR, PCH, etc. Board specific details are handled via platform >> definition. This driver already provides that functionality, IFAICS. > > Hi Wolfgang, > > It seems pch_can similar to c_can. > However, sorry, I don't know if pch_can core is the same as c_can since > LSI is provided by Intel. > If necessary, please contact to Intel.
You could also try to use that driver. I'm rather sure that it does work on your hardware as well. Wolfgang. _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
