On 05/18/2011 08:56 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: > What should be done with this patch now? > > 1. It could be committed to the SocketCAN SVN on BerliOS > 2. It could be posted on netdev-ml > > While '1' is easy to do, i wonder if this function would be added to mainline > without any user. IMHO the correct way would be to add this patch to the > mainline tree when you also add the 'user' of this patch - e.g. your SPI-based > CAN driver, right? > > I don't know if it's worth a try to add this function without a consumer ?!?
The not merged mcp2515 is a candidate for this function, too. regards, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
