On Aug 10, 2011, at 9:41 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > On 08/10/2011 04:15 PM, Robin Holt wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 03:47:43PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > ... >> Done, except the >>> compatible = "fsl,p1010-flexcan", "fsl,flexcan"; >> >> line is >> compatible = "fsl,flexcan", "fsl,flexcan-p1010"; > > IIRC, there order is more to less specific, e.g. for I2C: > > compatible = "fsl,mpc5200-i2c", "fsl-i2c" > > ... > >>> Please also correct the node names (not using the number suffix). >> >> So the node names should be >> can@1c000 { >> can@1d000 { >> correct? > > Yes, just have a look how other node names are constructed, e.g. for > sata, serial, rtc, etc.: > > $ grep serial@ *.dts > ... > pdm360ng.dts: serial@11000 { > pdm360ng.dts: serial@11100 { > pdm360ng.dts: serial@11200 { > pdm360ng.dts: serial@11300 { > pdm360ng.dts: serial@11400 { > pdm360ng.dts: serial@11600 { > pdm360ng.dts: serial@11800 { > pdm360ng.dts: serial@11B00 { > ... > > Wolfgang.
Agree w/Wolfgang here, can@1c000, can@1d000 is what we should use. - k _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list Socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core