Hi Oliver, On 09/22/2011 09:41 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > > i put Pavel and Andrey into CC, maybe they also have an opinion about this. > I just talked to a specialist who told me, that a higher SJW is better - if
Then let us set it to 4 (maximum), by default. But other documents recommend a value of 1. > possible. And if an expert told me so and i had a simple config interface to > fullfill it, it would be great for me ;-) Anyway, if SJW does not depend on other bit-timing parameters and it usually works fine with the kernel calculated parameters I would no longer vote against this patch. Wolfgang, _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list Socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
