Hi Wolfgang,

On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:14:57AM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Luotao Fu wrote:
<snip>
> > 
> > I'd prefer not to split it, since they're parameters, which are closelsy
> > related to another. sample_point will anyway be ignored, if it's set to
> > zero. To avoid misuse we can add some extra hint on this to the (still
> > non-existent) documentation.
> 
> I don't want to invite people playing with the sample-point.

All right, I'll take out the samplepoint setting from set_bitraate and add
a can_set_sample_point, additionally with a can_set_bitrate_samplepoint
for convenience for expert users.


> To be clear, sample_point==0 will not be ignored. It means using CIA
> recommended sample points for the specified bit-rate.

Yeah, I know. that's in the doc. I might have expresse myself
misunderstandingly.

cheers
Fu
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Dipl.-Ing. Luotao Fu        |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Socketcan-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-users

Reply via email to