Daniel Baluta wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Daniel Baluta wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Daniel Baluta wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I'm writing tests for an Intel based CAN controller and I've now >>>>> reached the part with bus off. >>>>> Can you give me some hints about how to generate a deterministic test >>>>> for bus off. >>>>> >>>>> I have a testcase where two nodes are communicating correctly using a >>>>> given baud rate, >>>>> and a third one tries to transmit using a different baud rate. Using >>>>> this test I can generate >>>>> bus off, but its not deterministic. >>>> What do you mean with "it's not deterministic"? >>> Not deterministic means that when I run the test multiple times I get >>> different results. (e.g I don't get >>> bus off each time ). >> I normally short-circuit CAN low and high to trigger bus-off. > > thanks, this works just fine. > anyhow, this implies either a manual configuration either a power switch. > it must be another way of generating this bus off condition.
Yes, I known. Maybe the device trying to provoke the bus-off goes bus-off itself. I you find aother way, please let me know. Wolfgang. _______________________________________________ Socketcan-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-users
